Showing posts with label persuasion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label persuasion. Show all posts

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Door-in-the-face Vs Foot-in-the-door

Reference: Wikipedia

The door in the face (DITF) technique is a persuasion method. Compliance with the request of concern is enhanced by first making an extremely large request that the respondent will obviously turn down. The respondent is then more likely to accede to a second, more reasonable request than if this second request were made without the first, extreme request. There is also a feeling of guilt associated with the DITF technique of sequential requests (Cialdini, 2000). A person is also more likely to agree with the second request because they feel guilty for having rejected the first request. A reference point (or framing) construal can also explain this phenomenon, as the initial bad offer sets a reference point from which the second offer looks like an improvement.

Will you donate $1000 to our organization? [Response is no].
Oh. Well could you donate $10?''

Can you help me do all this work?
Well can you help me with this bit?''

Can I stay out until 4am?
OK. How about midnight?''

Foot-in-the-door technique (FITD) is a compliance tactic that involves getting a person to agree to a large request by first setting them up by having that person agree to a modest request.

In an early study, a team of psychologists telephoned housewives in California and asked if the women would answer a few questions about the household products they used. Three days later, the psychologists called again. This time, they asked if they would send five or six men into the house to go through cupboards and storage places as part of a 2-hr enumeration of household products. The investigators found these women were more than twice as likely to agree to the 2-hr request than a group of housewives asked only the larger request.More recently, a group of persons were asked to call for a taxi if they became alcohol impaired. Half of the persons also signed a petition against drunk driving and half did not. Those who signed the petition (complied with a small request) were significantly more likely to comply with the larger request of calling a taxi when impaired compared to those who did not sign the petition.

Numerous experiments have shown that foot-in-the-door tactics work well in persuading people to comply, especially if the request is a pro-social request. Research has shown that FITD techniques work over the computer via email, in addition to face-to-face requests.